Appendix 17 Change Equality Impact Assessment (EqIA)
Appendix 17
Change Equality Impact Assessment (EqIA)
| 1. Proposal details | ||
| Name of the policy/project/process being assessed (subsequently referred to as project) |
Strategic Education Review Update Cabinet Report
Stage 2 – Statutory Notice (Consultation)
|
|
|
Purpose of project
|
The purpose of this report is to seek agreement to commence consultation on a number of proposals outlined below. The consultation proposals involve two school mergers.
The Authority recognises that school reorganisation of this nature will be of concern for local communities, however, the current position is not sustainable. Taking this into account, these proposals would enable the Borough to have a system of education that will bring about the highest possible standards of education for all of the children of North Tyneside for the short, medium, and long term. |
|
|
Who is the project intended to benefit?
|
The Authority is currently undertaking a Strategic Education and Inclusion Review across North Tyneside, seeking to ensure that a sustainable, sufficient, and high-quality educational system is maintained which enables all children and young people to achieve positive outcomes, including those with additional needs. One key priority of the Review aims to establish financial sustainability of schools.
The Authority has a commitment for all children and young people to have the right to attend a school which provides continued and improving high quality provision for all children, where the number of pupils on roll enables school leaders to provide a diverse curriculum and which is of an appropriate size for the local authority to fulfil its statutory responsibility regarding pupil places.
The proposal will advance equality of opportunity with regard to access to a high quality curriculum offer, a wider range of qualifications and wider social opportunities.
Any financial risk to the Authority arising from schools experiencing financial hardship is limited. |
|
|
What outcomes should be achieved?
|
In the light of the Strategic Education and Inclusion Review and the principles behind it, alongside the issues outlined above around school funding, the outcomes to be achieved are:
|
|
| Version of EqIA | 1 | |
| Confidential | no | |
| Date of this version created | 26/11/2025 | |
| Directorate | Children’s Services | |
| Service | Education, Skills and Employment | |
| Name | Service or organisation | |
| Principal author | Ian Wilkinson | Children’s Service |
| Additional authors | Lisa Ramshaw | Children’s Service |
| 2. Groups impacted | ||
| Does the project impact upon? | If yes, what is the estimated number impacted and the level of impact this will have on the group (high, medium, low)? | |
| Service users | yes |
Approximately 700 pupils currently at the named schools and potentially hundreds of prospective pupils in other schools will be impacted.
The is likely to cause significant stress and anxiety for pupils and their families and carers due to uncertainty.
Pupils, families, and carers are also likely to experience anxiety about supporting their children and young people through such a significant change if the school were to close.
High impact |
| Carers or family of service users |
yes
|
Carers and families of these pupils will be impacted.
Whilst the consultation process is undertaken pupils, families, and carers are likely to:
If the consultation proposals were to move to a decision, and the decision was to implement the proposals resulting in school closure / merger pupils, families, and carers could be:
High impact |
| Residents | yes |
Residents of North Tyneside both within the catchment areas and beyond.
Reputation of the education system and/ or the local area may be impacted, resulting in a change of perception for the local area affecting desirability and house prices.
Potential change to traffic patterns as pupil routes to school will change.
Concern for family members who are parents or carers of children who are attending or are looking to attend the schools within the proposal.
Low impact |
| Visitors | no |
|
| Staff | yes |
The consultation may cause stress and anxiety for staff employed by the schools in the proposals due to uncertainty.
Concerns from staff employed at the schools named in the proposals on the impact on their employment. If the consultation proposals were to move forward to a decision, and the decision was to implement the proposals resulting in a school closure/ merger, a separate impact assessment will need to be undertaken by the Governing Bodies as part of relevant employment processes and consultation.
High impact |
| Partner organisations | yes |
The receiving schools identified in the proposals will have an increased pupil population. This may lead to concerns regarding:
Parents may opt to relocate their child to a different school in North Tyneside because of these proposals.
Prospective parents may also change their preferred schools when applying for admission. This may positively impact schools who are undersubscribed and may negatively impact those schools who are oversubscribed / full.
Impact on other schools in North Tyneside due to uncertainty whilst the consultation process takes place.
Impact on other schools in North Tyneside if the consultation proposals were to move forward to a decision, and the decision was to implement the proposals resulting in a school closure/ merger.
Impact Medium |
| 3. Evidence gathering and engagement | ||
| Internal evidence | External evidence | |
| What evidence has been used for this assessment? |
Evidence has been gathered from briefing papers, Finance, and Data and Insights regarding demographics, capacity of schools, birth data, and pupil information.
Demographic information for the borough, including census data: Population Ambition for Education Strategy 2020 - 2024
SEND Inclusion Strategy 2021 - 2024
Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) and Alternative Provision (AP) Improvement Plan
Ambition for Education Cabinet Report 21 September 2022
Ambition for Education Cabinet Report 18 September 2023
Ambition for Education Cabinet Report 16 September 2024.
|
Best practice and statutory guidance as published by the Local Government Association (LGA): New Conversations
Legal frameworks
The Authority has a legal duty (by virtue of s.13A Education Act 1996) to ensure that its education functions are exercised with a view to:
The Education and Inspections Act 2006, Part 2 and Schedule 2 and The School Organisation (Establishment and Discontinuance of Schools) Regulations 2014.
Statutory guidance issued by the Department for Education (DfE) (Opening and closing maintained schools: Statutory guidance for proposers and decision makers, October 2024).
Section 15 of Education and Inspections Act 2006.
Consultation responses from the Have your Say Engagement process, parent/ carer presentations, parent/carer representative forums.
Requests for further information including FOI’s, Member & MP Enquiries, Education Review enquiries and enquiries from other stakeholders. |
| Have you carried out any engagement in relation to this proposal? | yes | |
| If yes of what kind and with whom? If no, why not? |
Public consultation has been undertaken through Have your Say Engagement, parent/ carer meetings, parent/ carer representative forums.
Requests for further information including FOI’s, Member and MP Enquiries, Education Review enquires and enquiries from other stakeholders.
Discussions have been held with the Deputy Mayor, and Cabinet Members and with the senior team leading services for schools.
Pre-publication consultation:
|
|
| Is there any information you do not have? | yes | |
| If yes, why is this information not available? |
Further consultation is now required through the statutory notice (consultation) period.
School census data does not include data on some protected characteristics including gender reassignment, religion, pregnancy and maternity, or sexual orientation of pupils. |
|
| 4. Impact on groups with different characteristics | |||
|
Legally protected characteristics |
Potential positive impact identified | Potential negative impact identified | Description of the potential impact and evidence used in the assessment (mitigations are not included here) |
| Age | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation:
Particular attention should be paid to the following impacts:
We know that some demographics are more likely to participate in engagement activities than others and this poses a risk of over-representation of certain groups, which could lead to negative impacts on under-represented groups.
Engagement using Have your Say will ensure that all relevant residents are able to contribute, making services more appropriate for residents of all ages.
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
Pupils currently at schools concerned and hundreds of prospective pupils in other schools if schools were to close.
The consultation proposals may cause stress and anxiety for pupils, their families, and carers due to uncertainty.
Families and carers likely to experience anxiety about supporting their children and young people through such a significant change if schools were to close.
The Authority has a commitment for all children and young people to have the right to attend a school which provides continued and improving high quality provision for all children, where the number of pupils on roll enables school leaders to provide a diverse curriculum and which is of an appropriate size for the local authority to fulfil its statutory responsibility regarding pupil places.
The proposal will advance equality of opportunity with regard to access to a high quality curriculum offer, a wider range of qualifications and wider social opportunities.
Going into any new setting with new pupils and staff would need careful handling. The young people will be supported by the school team, SEND staff, pastoral team and partner organisations if needed. |
| Disability | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation:
Particular attention should be paid to the following impacts:
Referring to and using information provided via engagement activities as noted as part of the pre-consultation process.
Engagement using Have your Say will ensure that all relevant residents are able to contribute, making services more appropriate for residents of all abilities.
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
Pupils with a physical disability, sensory impairment or neuro-diverse condition attending any of the schools may have specific additional needs that are currently well met.
It is anticipated that there could be a negative impact on mental health and wellbeing, in particular any children and young people with neurodiversity who may not respond positively to change of routine, loss of familiar adults, peers, familiar environment and needing to potentially attend an alternative school/ location.
Pupils with SEND and Education Health Care Plans (EHCPs) continuing to be supported in any new school setting.
Potential impacts of physical accessibility (getting to and getting around/ getting to and from any new school location) for those with mobility needs and sensory impairments.
Reconfiguration of existing space in any new location which could result in less breakout or alternative spaces being available.
Children with SEND may struggle to cope with disruption and changes caused by the proposals.
Loss of or greater demand on specific resources, equipment, and spaces for pupils with additional needs.
Going into a new school location/setting with some new pupils and staff would need careful handling. The young people will be supported by the school team, SEND staff, pastoral team and partner organisations if needed. |
| Gender reassignment | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation:
Engagements will take place via Have your Say ensuring residents are able to contribute, making services more appropriate for residents of all genders.
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
|
| Marriage & civil partnership | no | no | |
| Pregnancy & maternity | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation:
Particular attention should be paid to the following impacts:
|
| Race | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation: Particular attention should be paid to the following impacts:
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
|
| Religion or belief | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation: Particular attention should be paid to the following impacts:
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
|
| Sex | no | no |
Potential impact of the consultation: Particular attention should be paid to the following impacts:
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
The changes proposed will not disproportionately affect young people in respect of their sex. |
| Sexual orientation | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation:
Particular attention should be paid to the following impacts:
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
|
| Intersectionality | no | no |
Using Have Your Say will ensure that relevant demographic groups have their voice heard with regards to issues and changes to services which will affect them. Paying careful attention to who is included allows us to ensure that all demographic groups are represented fairly and equitably in engagement activities. Good data tracking will also highlight where issues have intersectional impact.
As noted above, there is also always a risk of over-representation of certain groups, as it is known that some demographics are more likely to participate in engagement activities than others. This could lead to negative impacts on under-represented groups. Where there are intersectional barriers, there is a greater likelihood of residents not feeling comfortable participating in engagement activities, and therefore not being included within reports and feedback. |
| Non-legally protected characteristics | |||
| Carers | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation: Carers can be underrepresented as:
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
It is acknowledged that there is likely to be a negative impact on any young carers.
The proposal is likely to cause significant stress and anxiety for pupils and their parents / carers due to uncertainty.
If the consultation proposals were to move forward to a decision, and the decision was to implement the proposals resulting in school closure / merger there would be additional financial costs, such as a need to purchase an alternative / new school uniform and potentially incur additional travel costs if mode of transport to school had to change from walking to public transport or use of private vehicles. Travel time may be extended too which may cause a problem for young carers.
Families and carers are also likely to experience anxiety about supporting their children and young people through such a significant change if the school were to close.
Carers and families may also face the cost of increased weekly travel and subsistence. |
| Socio-economic disadvantage | yes | yes |
Potential impact of the consultation: Socio-economic disadvantage presents particular challenges for consultation:
Using Have Your Say will ensure that all relevant residents are able to contribute, so that the voices of all residents are included in planning and running of services.
Potential impact of any proposed closure and/or merger:
It is acknowledged that there is likely to be a negative impact on low-income households, in particular those in receipt of Free School Meals. If the consultation proposals were to move forward to a decision, and the decision was to implement the proposals resulting in school closure / merger there would be additional financial costs, such as a need to purchase an alternative school uniform, and potentially incur additional travel costs if mode of transport to school had to change from walking to public transport or use of private vehicles.
Travel time may be extended too which may cause a problem for children, young people, and their families. |
| 5. Achievement of the Authority’s public sector equality duty | ||
| Will the proposal contribute to any of the following? | If yes, how? | |
| Eliminate unlawful discrimination, victimisation, and harassment | yes |
Through engagement, the Authority will build positive relationships with residents and particularly with communities which are at higher risk of discrimination, victimisation, and harassment.
The proposal will advance equality of opportunity with regard to access to a high-quality curriculum offer, a wider range of qualifications and wider social opportunities. |
| Advance equality of opportunity between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not |
yes
|
Well-planned and Inclusive engagement activities will ensure fair and equitable representation of residents, communities, and groups, which will help create equality of opportunity across services.
The proposal will advance equality of opportunity with regard to access to a high-quality curriculum offer, a wider range of qualifications and wider social opportunities. |
| Foster good relations between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not | yes |
The proposal will advance equality of opportunity with regard to access to a high-quality curriculum offer, a wider range of qualifications and wider social opportunities.
This should tackle prejudice and minimise barriers between groups, promoting understanding and normalising difference.
Engagement activities also present an opportunity for different voices to be heard and hear each other, increasing understanding and collaboration. |
| 6. Negative impacts | ||
|
Potential negative impact
|
Can it be reduced or removed? | If yes how? If no, why not and what alternative options were considered and not pursued? |
| Consultation - Language barriers | yes- reduced |
|
| Consultation - Fear of harassment or prejudice | yes- reduced |
|
| Consultation - Restrictions on time/availability | yes- reduced |
|
|
Consultation - The proposal is likely to cause significant stress and anxiety for pupils and their families and carers due to uncertainty.
|
yes- reduced |
|
|
Proposed closure/merger - Pupils, families and carers are also likely to experience anxiety about supporting their children and young people through such a significant change if the school were to close.
|
yes- reduced |
|
| Proposed closure/merger - Pupils attending the school with a physical disability or neuro-diverse condition may have specific additional needs that are currently well met. | yes- reduced |
|
| Proposed closure/merger - It is anticipated that there could be a negative impact on mental health and wellbeing, in particular any CYP with neurodiversity who may not respond positively to change of routine, loss of some peers, staff and attending an alternative school. | yes- reduced |
|
| Proposed closure/merger - there is likely to be a negative impact on low-income households, in particular those in receipt of FSM. If the school were to close there would be additional financial costs, such as a need to purchase an alternative school uniform, and potentially incur additional travel costs if mode of transport to school had to change from walking to public transport or use of private vehicles. | yes- reduced |
|
| 7. Action plan | ||||||
| Actions to gather evidence or information to improve NTC’s understanding of the potential impacts on people with protected characteristics and how best to respond to them | Responsible officer name | Responsible officer service area | Target completion date | Action completed | ||
| School census data does not include data on some protected characteristics including gender reassignment, religion, pregnancy and maternity, or sexual orientation of pupils. | Lisa Ramshaw | Education North Tyneside | Ongoing | In progress | ||
| Continuing monitoring of characteristics of residents who take part in the consultation, including collecting data through the Have Your Say Engagement. | Ashley Bell | Engagement | Ongoing | In progress | ||
| Continue to build relationships with communities through new and existing groups – particularly racial and religious groups. | Ashley Bell | Engagement | Ongoing | In progress | ||
| Support pupils with protected characteristics in any new /alternative school setting (particularly disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion, sexual orientation, carers and socio-economic). Going into any new setting/location with some new pupils and staff would need careful handling. The young people will be supported by the school team, SEND staff, pastoral team and partner organisations if needed. | Lisa Ramshaw | Education North Tyneside | Ongoing | In progress | ||
| Pupils attending school with a physical disability or neuro-diverse condition may have specific additional needs that are currently well met. Pupils with SEND and EHCPs will continue to be supported in any new school setting/ location. | Faye Bradshaw | SEND Support Service | Ongoing | In progress | ||
| It is anticipated that there could be a negative impact on mental health and wellbeing, in particular any children and young people with neurodiversity who may not respond positively to change of routine, loss of familiar adults, peers and attending an alternative school. Pupils with SEND and EHCPs will continue to be supported in any new school setting/ location. | Faye Bradshaw | SEND Support Service | Ongoing | In progress | ||
| Actions already in place to remove or reduce potential negative impacts | Responsible officer name | Responsible officer service area |
Impact
|
|||
| The consultation can be offered in a range of formats (including digital, paper, Easy Read and Braille) and languages including BSL. | Ashley Bell | Engagement | reduce | |||
| Continued engagement with communities with protected characteristics to build trust and develop relationships. | Ashley Bell | Engagement | reduce | |||
| Actions that will be taken to remove or reduce potential negative impacts | Responsible officer name | Responsible officer service area | Impact | Target completion date | Action completed | |
| The Authority will use its accessibility statement to ask people to let us know if they need materials in another format, or to access the consultation in another way. | Ashley Bell | Engagement | reduce | Ongoing |
in progress
|
|
| Actions that will be taken to monitor the equality impact of this proposal once it is implemented | Responsible officer name | Responsible officer service area | Target completion date | Action completed | ||
| Data will be evaluated and where possible and appropriate, feedback will be sought from the relevant communities. | Ashley Bell | Engagement | Ongoing |
in progress
|
||
| Date review of EqIA to be completed | Responsible officer name | Responsible officer service area | ||||
| 24/11/2025 | Ian Wilkinson | Children’s Services | ||||
| 8. Outcome of EqIA | |
| Outcome | Please explain and evidence why you have reached this conclusion: |
| The proposal is robust, no major change is required |
There is no negative impact on the organisation’s ability to meet the aims of the 2010 Equality Act, the evidence provided in this assessment shows that:
|
| 9. Corporate Equality Group member approval | |
| Do you agree or disagree with this assessment? | Agree |
| If disagree, please explain why? | |
| Name of Corporate Equality Group Member | Anne Foreman |
| Date | 26/11/2025 |
| 10. Director/ Head of Service approval | |
| Do you agree or disagree with this assessment? |
Agree
|
| If disagree, please explain why? | |
| Name of Director/Head of Service | Julie Firth |
| Date | 26/11/2025 |
Please return the document to the Author and Corporate Equality Group member.